Model Performance Comparison
| model | target | RMSE | R2 / AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Regression | CCI | 2.361 | 0.021 |
| Linear Regression | Retail | 14.890 | 0.135 |
| Logistic Regression | CCI direction | 0.469 | |
| Decision Tree | CCI | 2.326 | 0.046 |
| Random Forest | CCI | 1.968 | 0.324 |
| Random Forest (Tuned) | CCI | 1.923 | 0.359 |
| Random Forest | Retail | 5.510 | 0.871 |
| Gradient Boosting | CCI | 1.988 | 0.312 |
| KNN Regression | CCI | 2.220 | 0.108 |
0.871
Random Forest Retail
Best CV R2 in notebook
0.324
Random Forest CCI
Moderate non-linear CCI signal
0.469
Logistic CCI Direction
AUC below random
5.96
Holdout Retail RMSE
R2=0.892, MAE=3.59
Regression and Classification Diagnostics
Feature Importance Figures
Model Comparison and Additional Model Figures
Clustering and Country Climate Profile Figures
Actual vs Predicted Diagnostic
The retail model sits much closer to the diagonal than linear baselines, but this should be read as predictive association, not causal weather effect.
Why Weak Models Matter
Linear regression and CCI direction classification are intentionally shown. Negative or weak results demonstrate that the project is testing claims rather than only displaying successful models.